Browse

Quick Search

... by Riding
... by Candidate

Upcoming Nomination Meetings

|
Home: Blog--Guide to the Pundits' Guide
41st General Election Nominations Progress Chart

Nominations Progress - 41st General Election

Seats with First-Time Incumbents
 YTNTNUBCABSKMBONQCNBNSPENLTotPctWomPct
Seats1113628141410675101147308  
Lib11 1584790468103619965%6532.7%
NDP 1 191086711026 213544%4734.8%
Grn1 116187127950273 19664%5829.6%
BQ        40    4013%1025.0%
Cons  1302813127721543 19463%3719.1%
Ind     1 11    31%133.3%
Oth    1  1     21%150.0%

BLOG -- Guide to the Pundits' Guide

Saturday, May 1, 2010

Location of New RSS Feed

At some point over the weekend, when you go to the Pundits' Guide homepage it is going to start looking a little different. When that happens, you'll know that the first step of our migration from Blogger to WordPress is complete.

Once that does happen, the new location of the website's feed will be:

http://www.punditsguide.ca/feed/

[No, it's not working just yet, but I had to publish it now for reasons I'll explain below.]

A very few parts of the site won't be working right away, but we'll be getting caught up soon enough, and after that some new functionality will be coming along all in good time.

Clearly, you can appreciate that I'm praying very hard for the parties in the Commons to be able to come to some agreement, or at least take their time debating any question of privilege in committee before bringing a motion back to the House.

Switching from Blogger to WordPress became necessary because of Google's decision to de-support FTP publishing using the Blogger platform after May 1 (i.e., today). I can see why they took that decision, given that such a small proportion of their users were using that option but it was consuming a huge amount of their band-width.

But because this website is so much more than just the blog, I did not want to stick with any of their remaining options, and became persuaded that a migration to WordPress to handle the content management of more than simply the blog was the right move. Luckily I've had some incredibly talented and experienced help to smooth the transition.

Thank you for your patience, and we'll be right back atcha on the WordPress side of things soon enough. Or you can follow @punditsguide on Twitter, where I'll be tweeting once it goes live.

Labels:

Sunday, September 13, 2009

Census Search Comes to the Pundits' Guide

Probably one of the top requests I get from users of the Pundits' Guide database, is how to work backwards from the "Census Data" tab of a riding profile page. For readers of the blog who haven't delved into the database side of this web site (the so-called "web application"), there is a mind-boggling amount of trivia available for perusal there.

For example, if you go and examine the riding profile page for Saanich – Gulf Islands, BC where Green Party leader Elizabeth May announced this week that she would be seeking her party's nomination, and then click on the tab labelled "Census Data" (or just follow this link to see where that is), you will notice that a lot of different census information is available about the riding, which is grouped under a series of headings for you to click on and delve into further.

Continuing our example, you could open up the second group entitled "Age", and notice that the median age in that riding in the 2006 census was 48.3 years old, the #1 ranked riding in the country on that census metric (which was one of the major arguments against her running there, according to former Green Party strategist Greg Morrow in the first of his series of blogposts on the decision).

The question the Guide did not allow users to answer is this one: "OK we know who's #1, but then which riding is #2?"

Until now.

I've just put the finishing touches on a new module called "Browse Census". It enables users to drill down via the same groupings of census metrics used on the riding profile pages, and generate the ranking of ridings, whether by percent or raw census metric value, and either sorted high to low or the other way around.

Some sample queries would be the following:
  • Which ridings have the highest percentage of dwellings requiring major repair? (see here for the answer)
  • ... the largest number of first generation Canadians? (answered here)
  • ... the smallest number of home-owners? (answered here)
  • ... the greatest proportion of Catholics? (answered here)
  • ... the lowest percentage of total income coming from Government Transfers? (see here)
  • ... the highest rates of child poverty after taxes? (view the answer here)
  • ... the largest number of people employed in art, culture, recreation and sport (confirm your guesses here)
The ridings are listed by rank, show previous contest and margin information, and are linked back to the "Census Data" tabs on the riding profile pages.

I hope you like this new functionality, and always appreciate hearing people's ideas for new data and analyses to add to the Guide. They're all on a big to-do list, and I'm working through them as time and other commitments permit.

If you encounter a bug using the new module, please report it, so I can fix things up ASAP.

Labels: ,

Sunday, March 15, 2009

By-election Candidate Spending Updated

Candidate election campaign return data has now been entered and/or updated for the 2006 By-elections, the 2007 By-elections, and the 2008 By-elections.

Moreover I also found the time to add in the information required to link to every candidate's original return details at the Elections Canada website (except for 1997 General Election candidates, since that election's data is nearly impossible to link to directly; sorry).

If you're new to the Pundits' Guide, here's how to find candidate financial data:
  • Find your riding of interest, either by
    • drilling down through the "Browse Regions" page, or
    • doing a Quick Search from the left-hand column on any part of the riding name, or by
    • doing a Quick Search for a candidate of interest on any part of the candidate's name, and then clicking on the relevant riding from the candidate index page.

  • From the riding profile page (e.g., let's look at Vancouver Quadra, BC), click on the "Financial Metrics" tab
How to find the different tabs on a riding profile page
  • If you want to bookmark the page with that tab's data showing, click on the link called "Permalink" at the top-right hand corner of the page (in our example, you'd wind up here)
  • Don't forget that candidate financial data displayed in italics at the Pundits' Guide is still in the "as submitted" stage (in our example below, Green Party candidate Dan Grice's return still has not been reviewed by Elections Canada, and so appears in italics)
  • Now, notice the small Elections Canada icon next to each candidate's name. If you hover your mouse pointer over the icon, it says "Link to Candidate Financial Return at Elections Canada"
How to find the link to a candidat
  • If you click on that icon, it opens the candidate's return details from the Elections Canada website in a new window.
  • Unfortunately Elections Canada does not label that page with the candidate's name, but TRUST ME. Select a part of the return you're interested in (e.g., "Part 2a - Statement of Contributions Received"), and click on it. Now, you're away to the races. You can even select a different part of the return from the drop-down list they provide.
Nearly all of the by-election returns are in "as reviewed" state for the 2006 and 2007 by-elections, but there are quite a few still in the "as submitted" stage for the 2008 by-elections candidates, as you can see from the table below.

# of Candidate Returns either Nil, or Not Submitted to, or Not Yet Reviewed by, Elections Canada; by Party and Electoral Event

PartyParty Name2006 By2007 By2008 By
OthCanadian Action Party

1
Othneorhino.ca

1
IndIndep/No Affil1

LibLiberal Party of Canada1
2
NDPNew Democratic Party
1
2
ConsConservative Party of Canada

1
GrnGreen Party of Canada
1
3

Labels: , , , , ,

Saturday, November 1, 2008

New Queries: Cabinet and Caucus Officers

On Thursday, Prime Minister Stephen Harper unveiled his new 37-member cabinet, including 10 women.

Several caucuses also had their first meetings since the election. New caucus officers have not been announced as yet, but the existing ones who were reelected will continue to carry out their duties pending further announcements, in preparation for the return of Parliament on Monday, November 18.

This seemed like a good time to add a couple of new queries on the "Search the Database" page:
  • Current Cabinet members and their ridings, for the 40th Parliament, and
  • Current Caucus officers and their ridings, for the 40th Parliament
The query tables show the positions, members, ridings and recent election stats, along with hyperlinks to related information pages at the Pundits' Guide. Although the Green Party does not have a Caucus, I've shown their Leader and two Deputy Leaders as well.

Of the Cabinet Ministers, Gail Shea from Egmont, PE has the narrowest margin (0.3%), while the Prime Minister himself (Calgary Southwest, AB) is tied with Jason Kenney (Calgary Southeast, AB) for the widest margin (63.7% each).

I've moved the Nominations Progress queries for the recent general election a bit further down that page, and put these new queries for the Current Parliament at the top. Hope you find them to be a helpful reference.

Labels:

Tuesday, July 1, 2008

Black Mark: Voter Turnout in Alberta

Although the scope of this website is for now usually limited to federal elections, your Guide is visiting Alberta and British Columbia this Canada Day long weekend, and happened across an excellent series of features in the Calgary Herald that readers might find interesting.

"Black Mark: Why We Don't Vote" is an in-depth look at why voter turnout (that's the percent of people on the voters list who actually cast a vote) hit an all-time low of 41.3% in Alberta during the recent provincial election.

To quote from the lead story, penned by Renata D'Aliesio and Jason Fekete:
Alberta gave the country Senate reform, spawned several historical political movements and helped women gain the right to vote.

But can the province with the lowest turnout in Canada rescue itself from a disturbing new trend -- where more than half of its population decides not to mark an X at the ballot box? This is the question confounding politicians, pundits and pollsters as the electorate grapples with the stark fact that six in 10 Albertans didn't vote in the March election. It's believed to be the worst showing ever in a provincial campaign.

Leaders from municipal councils to the House of Commons worry a troubling trend is emerging across the country as more people disengage from the democratic process.

"We Canadians sometimes take our democracy for granted, but we don't realize how unique we are," Prime Minister Stephen Harper told the Herald in an editorial column to be published Sunday.
The Prime Minister was joined by Preston Manning, and other prominent Albertans and academics in contributing their perspectives on why turnout was low in the last provincial election, and how it might be increased, and included the results of a poll commissioned by Elections Alberta exploring people's reasons for non-participation.

So, how can we use the Pundits' Guide to look at Voter Turnout in Federal Elections?

  • Nationally -- The summary chart at the top of the "Browse Elections" page shows us the three relevant numbers for all the general elections in the guide:
    • (a) "Electors" - the number of people eligible to vote, by virtue of citizenship, residency and age,
    • (b) "Voted" - the number of electors who voted, and
    • (c) "% TO" - where TO stands for "Turnout"; it is calculated as (b) - Voted divided by (a) - Electors and then multipled by 100 (for further information, see the description on the Pundit Metrics page).
  • Broken down by Electoral Event -- Still on the "Browse Elections" page, and looking down the left-hand column of the "Election Summary Data" tab, you will see the Percent Turnout (% TO) for every electoral event, including by-elections as well as general elections. For example, the electoral events with the lowest turnouts in recent history (that means with the lowest turnout in this database, i.e., since 1997) were:
  • Broken down by Region, Province or lower -- Still on the "Browse Elections" page, notice the drop-downs and list-boxes to the left of the chart. Select a province from the drop-down list, and notice that all the calculations have been re-done for just that province (let's pick Prince Edward Island, for example). Turnout there jumped from 70.8% in the 2004 General Election to 73.2% in the 2006 General. Now let's select a different province (I guess we ought to look at Alberta then). Notice that turnout in federal elections in Alberta has varied between 58.5% and 61.9%. And in fact, the by-election that returned Stephen Harper to Ottawa as an M.P. showed only a 23% turnout in the lone Alberta riding voting that day, namely Harper's riding of AB: Calgary Southwest (although the Liberal party did not field a candidate in that race).
  • Broken down by Riding -- The riding profile page for any riding shows the history of its voter turnout for each electoral event. For example, Lac-Saint-Louis, QC on the West Island of Montréal had the highest turnout in 1997, Cardigan, PE had the highest turnout in both the 2000 and 2004 General Elections, while Nepean – Carleton, ON, currently represented by Conservative M.P. Pierre Poilievre, had the highest voter turnout in the 2006 General Election.

Anyway, I can see that it would be nice to have a Turnout by Province by Electoral Event cross-tabulation table somewhere (likely the "Search Data" page), for comparisons' sake. There also needs to be a new Election Pundit Query about ridings with the highest and lowest turnouts. For now, have fun exploring the data on turnout currently available throughout the Pundits' Guide.

Labels: ,

Friday, June 6, 2008

The Big Catchup

Spring gardening: check. Spring cleaning: check. Paperwork, client work, sending bright young person off into the world for a first job in her new profession: check, check, check. Starting back into running along the Rideau Canal to lose some of the "pundit's girth" I've accumulated over this very intense, very sedentary first year of the project: well, I'm trying ... I'll go out again tomorrow ... promise ...

Meantime, a few things have drawn me back to the Pundits' Guide, not least of which were the very kind emails I've received from several readers asking would I return soon. Thank you everyone so much for writing (Sally Field moment).

Also with the scheduled adjournment of the House of Commons looming, nomination news is revving back up; the 2006 Census Federal Electoral District profiles are expected soon; and the party with the ammo may now finally have its finger on the trigger [UPDATE: but will probably not pull it on Monday after all] . So I have to get ready on a number of fronts.

One big item of news this week was the announced retirement of four-time Halifax, NS M.P. and former NDP Leader, Alexa McDonough. Since Ms. McDonough had already been nominated, the NDP count is now down by one, and of course the count of Retiring Incumbents (see the second "Nominations Progress" query on the Search Data page) is now up by one to 27 as well. At this point, only Green Ryan L. Watson is nominated in Halifax riding, former Liberal candidate Martin MacKinnon having stepped down to take another job in February. [UPDATE: Stephen Maher has a good run-down of the potential candidates in this morning's column, but read it quickly, as it's only up for 7 days.]

A sidebar: Alexa mentioned in several interviews this week that she had been the only woman M.P. elected from Atlantic Canada in the 2006 General Election. How would we use the Pundits' Guide to see these stats? Well, start by going to the "Browse Parties" page, then selecting "2006 General Election" from the Elections drop-down to the left of the chart, and "Atlantic Canada" from the Regions drop-down (or click here). The "Party Summary" tab appears by default, and shows that in the 32 ridings down east, the Conservatives nominated just one woman in the last election, the Liberals nominated two, the Green Party ran 11 women (34.4%), and the NDP ran 13 women (40.6%).

Now, to see who the candidates were: still on the same page, click on the "Party Details" tab (or click here), and notice that the winning candidates are highlighted in the left-hand column (only one has an "(F)" next to their name). Casting your eyes down the list, notice that each party's candidates are highlighted in turn in their own colum, so we see that the lone Conservative woman candidate was Cynthia Downey in Random – Burin – St. George's, NL, and the two Liberal women were Siobhan Coady in St. John's South – Mount Pearl, NL and Marcelle Mersereau in Acadie – Bathurst, NB.

In any event, I figured it's time to get back into the pundit groove. Now, where were we? Ah yes, I promised an update of nominations from the Green Party. Coming right up ...

Labels: , ,

Tuesday, April 15, 2008

Report an Error working again

Just a short note to say that the "Report an Error on This Page" feature which had stopped working during an upgrade of server software is now working again ... and I've already received some emails this evening as a result.

I apologize for any annoyance this may have caused anyone earlier (kind of ironic to have an error in the "report an error" part, eh!). Please take this as an invitation to send along any errors you do notice in the data, and I'll undertake to have them corrected as soon as possible.

Labels:

Sunday, March 23, 2008

Two New Metrics

The recent by-elections have raised some issues about how to assess the performance of political parties who don't win or place second, but nevertheless may be growing or not at others' expense.

Your Guide does caution that extrapolating from by-elections having extraordinarily low turnouts to a general case is very unsafe, since there is no reason to believe that the by-election turnout is a representative sample of the turnout in a general election ... and especially not in the case of the northern Saskatchewan seat . We would need to see turnout data on a poll-by-poll basis up there, and it would have to be read by folks with a lot more local knowledge than me. Especially in that riding, one would need to consider that recent changes in voter identification laws might have had an impact, and/or that political parties, being largely viewed as inventions of white folks, wind up being far less relevant than the geographic and aboriginal background of the individual candidates in such a riding.

Nevertheless, it is helpful to have a wider array of metrics to draw on for comparison over time, and so I've started to add a few of them into the database now.

  • Strong 3rd-place finishes. A count of the cases where a party's candidate placed third in a riding defined as having had a "close 3-way race" (i.e., the Percent Margin between first-place and third-place was less than or equal to 15% points). As more political parties become competitive, this pool of seats should also be closely watched as potential targets of the 3rd place party as well as the first- and second-place finishers.
  • Ridings where the Party's candidate was eligible for a Rebate of election expenses. A count of the number of seats in which a party's candidate achieved a high enough percent of the vote to qualify for a public rebate of their election and candidate expenses. In the old days, we used to call this "getting your deposit back" (as in "poor candidate X, he lost so badly he didn't even get his deposit back"), although the rules have changed a lot since then. When the practice was first instituted, parties had to get 15% of the vote or more in a riding (and this is still the case in many provinces) to "get their rebate". Federally the riding rebate threshold changed to 10% with the 2004 General Election. Parties themselves also now become eligible for rebates with separate thresholds involved, but I haven't included or analyzed that data here yet.
To draw out the second metric a bit further, I've assembled an overview table here of the second metric. Remember that the threshold for receiving a rebate decreased from 15% to 10% in 2004. A couple of things stand out very clearly from the table.
  • the very large increase for the NDP between 2000 and 2004 that continued to grow in 2006
  • the value of the new lower threshold to parties like the Greens (compare with the Bloc Québecois for whom it seemed to make little difference in the short term)
  • as of 2006, the "conservative" parties are stronger together than they were apart in 2000
  • the Liberals, who could previously count on a 10% or better showing in every seat but 2 or 3, fell short of that watermark in 25 seats during the last general election.
Count of Candidates Eligible for Rebate of Expenses by Election and Party
Elec%TotLibNDPGrnBQCons/RefPCRest
200610%308283 (244)214 (145)7 (0)73 (70)303 (291)( )4 (3)
200410%308307 (298)195 (134)3 (1)74 (72)251 (227)( )6 (5)
200015%301(298) 288(86) 57( ) (73) 69(208) 182(143) 87(3) 2
199715%301(299) 292(121) 87( ) (73) 70(192) 161(233) 189(3) 2

This analysis has got me interested in categorizing party performance by percentage of the vote in deciles or something like that, and seeing how it changes over time, but that's a project for another day.

For now, the metrics "Strong 3" and "Rebate" appear on both the Browse Regions and Browse Elections summary tables, and I've freed up space in those tables by pulling out some summary data into stats tables above them (slightly different versions of the stats table appear on each of the two pages).

Next up: the number of seats in which a party increased its percentage of the vote, vs. the number of seats in which its vote declined, and I'll let users compare two parties against each other on those measures, in order to assess the contest between them.

Labels: , ,

Tuesday, March 4, 2008

One up; one down

The Liberals have gained one woman candidate, but lost another:

Thus, the latest party nomination totals, which can be found here on the "Search Data" page, remain unchanged.

At that same page, you can also now find quick links to the pundit queries otherwise buried in the third tab of each of the browse page ("party" pundit queries are not there yet, but will be soon). I've also fixed the sort order, and improved the execution speed on some of the queries.

Finally, I've added the "Search Data" page to the left-side navigation tabs, for easier access. This thing may actually be finished before the 39th Parliament ends after all!

Labels: , ,

Wednesday, February 27, 2008

Two Updates, One New Query Table

Two items of news:

Also, one new query table, Nomination counts by party and previous rank for the 40th General Election, has been added to the "Search Data" page. It answers the questions:

  • In what percent of the seats they won at the last election, has a party nominated candidates now? Obviously, parties will focus on the seats they hold, followed by the seats in which they came second last time, and/or other seats they may be targetting. This shows how well they're doing at concentrating their efforts on those priorities.
  • What percentage of women candidates has been nominated in the parties' best seats (i.e., its wins at last election, and second-place finishes), as compared with the "other" seats.

Labels: , , , ,

Sunday, February 24, 2008

New Candidates and New Query Tables

Today's update includes two nominations from Saturday, which just happen to highlight rather nicely the use of two new query tables I've been working on, over on the "Search Data" page.

To run them, click either the hyperlink or the arrow for the query you want, in order to issue the request to the database. Afterwards you can hide and show the results again by clicking in the same way.

(Ces resultats sont aussi disponible en français à "Rechercher les données", mais le texte n'est pas encore traduit car la page reste en construction. La redirection entre anglais et français sur cette page n'est pas encore construite non plus. J'espère que mes amis français continueront d'être patient avec moi.)

Today's new query tables are:

Nominations in seats with retiring incumbents (first query currently found on the page).

  • These seats, especially when not in regions with an overwhelming history of majorities for one party, can often be the most volatile in an election, since no candidate enjoys the benefit of incumbency.
  • By-elections are a special case of this general rule, but one in which the parties are able to focus resources on just a few seats rather than an entire national campaign, and they are in some cases ridings where a party may not have put on a full court press before.
  • In the cases where a party *has* had an overwhelming history of majorities in the area (the Conservatives in Calgary are today's case in point), winning the party nomination in these ridings can be the hardest part of winning the seat.
  • Hence, lawyer Devinder Shory's victory at yesterday's Conservative nomination meeting for the Calgary Northeast, AB seat vacated by retiring Conservative M.P. Art Hangar, came after a very competitive race.

Nominations in seats with first-time incumbents (second query currently found on the page).
  • If winning a seat for the first time is hard, keeping it the next time out can be almost as difficult. Incumbency is worth more the more elections a candidate wins, but on your first time running as the incumbent, you're the target. Especially if the person you defeated last time opts for a rematch ... expect to see both sides very well-financed, very well-prepared, and probably a little bitter. Lots of drama here.
  • For a really volatile race, though, you can't beat the seats where the first-time incumbent's party had never held the seat previously (or at least not for a long time). Clearly, the electorate there is shifting patterns: these are very interesting ridings to watch, and historically difficult to handicap.
  • Today's second candidate announcement relates to just such a riding: Lévis – Bellechasse, QC was won in 2006 by Conservative Steve Blaney after a massive upwards swing in their vote; defeating the Bloc's Réal Lapierre, who himself won in 2004 by defeating the Liberal's Christian Jobin. Jobin had only just been elected in a by-election the previous year (2003), held to replace retiring Bloc M.P. Antoine Dubé in the pre-redistribution seat of Lévis-et-Chutes-de-la-Chaudière. The Liberal vote fell here from 39% to 8% between 2000 and 2006, while the Conservative vote rose from 18-19% in 2000-2004 to 46% in 2006, and the Bloc vote ranged from a high of 44% to a low of 29%.
  • So, now we can throw into the mix yesterday's announcement by NDP Leader Jack Layton and his Québec lieutenant Tom Mulcair of a former provincial associate deputy minister of energy, Denis L'Homme, as their candidate in this riding. Like I said before, you need a programme to follow all these twists (maybe a Pundits' Guide ;-) ?!), but it will no doubt be a riding to watch.

In coming days, rather than manually create static result tables inside these blog posts, I will be creating permanent "live" (i.e., always up-to-date) versions of them over on the Search Data page. That page will also serve as an index to and overview of the so-called "pundit queries" which already accessible from the Browse Regions / Browse Elections / Browse Parties pages, and will be listed as one of the left-hand navigation tabs, rather than on the top-most navigation bar where it sits now.

To change the subject briefly, Monday is the close of nominations for the four by-election ridings. I am hearing that the Green Party will have a candidate in place for Desnethé – Missinippi – Churchill River by then (but not who it is yet). Ironically, here is a riding that fits both of the above categories: former Liberal M.P. Gary Merasty was a first-time incumbent in 2006, and has already since retired.

[If you're wondering why that riding appears twice in the second query, there's just a little tweaking to the query code I need to do eliminate the second blank entry. Basically I have separate entries for the by-elections and general elections, but only list candidates in the first one (long story). I'm working on it now.]

Labels: , , , , ,

Tuesday, February 19, 2008

Some New Pundit Queries

There are 5 new "party pundit queries" that you can get to by going to the third tab on the "Browse Parties" page. They are:

I've used a different party for each query example. The charts are working for the highest level (just the party), and hopefully I can get them working for provinces too, but the region and "local_region" ones will take a wee bit longer (long story).

Fairly soon, I will add summary data on these measures to the summary tables as well.

Labels:

Friday, January 18, 2008

How to find a Candidate's history

We learned this morning that the Green Party's deputy leader, Claude William Genest, was chosen to be its candidate in the riding of Westmount – Ville-Marie at a contested nomination meeting. Given that incumbent M.P. Lucienne Robillard's resignation is set to take effect next week, leading to a possible additional by-election call, this makes Genest the only announced candidate besides Liberal Marc Garneau in a riding that will be watched very closely .

Has Genest run before? How could we find this out using the Pundits' Guide?

From any page, you can launch a "Quick Search" on his name. This search will look at any part of the name and is not case sensitive, but let's say we search on the last name "Genest". Claude William Genest is returned as the first Genest in the database, so selecting his name and clicking the Go button (or just double-clicking on the name) will bring the user to the Candidate index page for Claude William Genest (found here).

From the Candidate index page we can see that, in addition to being nominated in Westmount, Genest has run federally at least twice before (data prior to 1997 are not included); in the Québec ridings of Saint-Jean in 2004 and in Jeanne-Le Ber in 2006, both Bloc-Liberal contests. We can see that he ran for the Greens both times, placed 5th, and increased his vote percent from 3% to 5%. Following the hyperlinks to either of those ridings, we can look up the biographical details he supplied to the CBC web-sites (there are 2 CBC icons for the current set of ridings, one each from their 2004 and 2006 election pages).

Or, following the link to the riding of Westmount – Ville-Marie, we notice that Marc Garneau is the designated Liberal candidate, and then following the hyperlink on his name there, remind ourselves that last time he ran in Vaudreuil – Soulanges, losing to Bloc incumbent Meili Faille by a raw margin of over 9,000 votes.

Every resource in the Guide is or will eventually be hyperlinked to every other resource, and so there are multiple ways to arrive at any page. Should you want to bookmark the page you've finally arrived at, don't forget to click on the link called "Permalink" first before copying any address from the address bar, or adding the page to your favourites.

Clearly there is more than can and will be added to the Candidate Index pages ... links to Wikipedia pages, Parliamentary pages and votings records, party leadership and/or cabinet membership. It's all on my to-do list, along with a "Browse Candidates" page similar to the pages that now permit the browsing of parties, elections and regions. But first, I've got to finish the campaign finance and expenditure work.

Labels: , , , ,

Saturday, October 20, 2007

How to Search the Database

If you're just looking for the results from a single riding or a single candidate, use one of the Quick Searches to your left.
You can also Browse results for any kind of Election (election, by-election, redistribution), for a Region, Province or group of Ridings, for Candidates (not quite ready yet), or for one of the major political Parties, by using the menu items on your left.
All the data is cross-referenced by hyperlink, so when you find results for a riding, you can jump to results for each of the candidates, for any of its related ridings, or for any of the parties.
You can peruse all the available queries by Searching the Data.
Or, you can learn your way around by exploring the queries highlighted here in my blog, the Guide to the Pundits' Guide.

Labels: