National Poll Bump Masks Liberal Organizational Weakness on the Ground
[Welcome, National Newswatch readers!]
The strategic vote bump the Liberals are currently enjoying from the one daily tracking pollster of the campaign belies the undeniable weakening of the party's organization outside their traditional and dwindling number of strongholds in the Atlantic provinces, anglophone Quebec, and metropolitan Ontario.
In the lead-up to the March 25 non-confidence vote in the Commons, the Liberals lost more candidates than any other party except the Greens (who themselves set a new record for slate churn), with supposedly key swing ridings losing strong candidates, including high-profile business-woman Deborah Gillis in Halton, Margaret Black in Newmarket-Aurora, ON, the former mayor of Telkwa, BC Sharon Hartwell, Québec city nutritionist Anne Gagné, credit-union manager Louis Bérubé in Richmond-Arthabaska, QC, and France Beaulieu in Saint-Maurice-Champlain amongst others, all of which had to be backfilled with newcomers in the final weeks before nominations close on Monday.
In all, 39 duly nominated Liberal candidates have stepped down for one reason or another in this pre-election cycle, as compared with 22 New Democrats, 20 Conservatives, 1 Bloquiste, and at least 123 Greens (and those were just the Greens I was able to document).
Even in the weeks leading up to the campaign, the Liberals still had no candidates in major Ontario battleground ridings around Toronto, such as Burlington, Cambridge, Durham, Halton, Newmarket-Aurora, or Oshawa, nor in Simcoe-Grey. And the party had numerous holes in its western slate.
While no party is strong everywhere in the country, the once "natural governing party" has been left to beg for a local candidate in the Red Deer paper, a slot it has still not filled at time of writing. The Bloc was the first party to field a full slate (at least for them), several days into the campaign. The NDP followed with the first full national slate last Monday, the same day the Conservatives completed the 307 slots they probably intend to fill (no candidate is yet named to run against Independent M.P. André Arthur). However, the Liberals were still scrambling for 5 candidates in BC, 4 in Alberta, and 1 in Nunavut, as of last Monday.
They've since filled all but Red Deer, and in the case of Nunavut with a very strong candidate indeed: territorial speaker and former premier Paul Okalik who says he made up his mind to run the previous weekend after listening to Conservative Leader Stephen Harper. Okalik will now be running against his former Finance Minister, first-term Conservative M.P. Leona Aglukkaq.
But after losing a candidate in Manicouagan to a successful hit from the NDP's researchers, it took them three days to find replacement candidate Simon Bérubé, while the NDP replaced Ryan Dolby in Elgin-Middlesex-London with CAW local activist within 24 hours. Fortunately for the Liberals, disgraced "association for the rights of whites" founder André Forbes' signs didn't need to be taken down in Manicouagan, as they had never gone up except for one in the main intersection of Baie Comeau. Jack Layton went on to fill a room in a boisterous rally for his new candidate outside London, but meanwhile it's not Michael Ignatieff who's been to Baie Comeau, but Gilles Duceppe to defend his Bloc incumbent from the sudden growth in NDP support.
The Liberal Party also has more incumbents in serious trouble than other opposition parties. At least 17 incumbents are facing uphill battles or unusually strong challenges across the country, with another open seat likely out of contention, and four other open seats seeing open competition. Should the polls deteriorate further for the Liberals, obviously, more of the seats around Toronto would be in play, as they are more party brand seats than local MP ones, being in a large metropolitan area.
- In Newfoundland, Avalon M.P. Scott Andrews and St. John's South-Mount Pearl M.P. Siobhan Coady are facing challenges from a former provincial cabinet minister and a former Senator running for the Conservatives, with the NDP's returning candidate Ryan Cleary playing an unknown role in the likely three-way split in the latter case, given his second place finished in 2008, and the whipped gun registry vote playing spoiler in the former.
- In Prince Edward Island, class of 1988 Liberal M.P. Lawrence MacAuley is facing an unexpectedly strong threat from sharp-elbowed former provincial cabinet minister Mike Currie, with fellow Liberal M.P. Wayne Easter long since targeted by veterinarian Tim Ogilvie, also for the Conservatives. The open seat of Charlottetown may be the Liberals' strongest on the Island now.
- In Nova Scotia, Dartmouth-Cole Harbour M.P. Mike Savage is facing a very strong challenge from former provincial NDP leader Robert Chisholm, as evidenced by the visits of both party leaders to that riding early in the campaign.
- In New Brunswick, where their provincial cousins were decimated in last fall's provincial election, and reduced to a rump on the francophone east shore, the Liberals lost candidates in the months leading up to the non-confidence vote, both in Fredericton (Pamela Campbell) and Fundy Royal (Dave Delaney), and former Ignatieff chief of staff Paul Zed bowed out of running in Saint John at the last minute. The party has since refilled those slots, and in Saint John finally installed the former deputy mayor Stephen Chase last Tuesday, but as of yesterday there were still no Liberal signs up in their former stronghold of Saint John [UPDATE: another reader says more like the day before yesterday], while the Conservatives were out of the gate early, and even the NDP who had moved their top-performing 2008 candidate UNB economist Rob Moir over from Fundy Royal to Saint John last month, had their signs up within two days of the writ being issued. On the bright side for the Liberals, Bernard Lord declined to enter the race for the Conservatives in Moncton-Riverview-Dieppe leaving Liberal M.P. Brian Murphy on much safer ground, but meanwhile Liberal Jean-Claude d'Amours is now facing his strongest possible Conservative opponent in former Mulroney-era cabinet minister Bernard Valcourt, whose sister was elected provincially last fall alongside three other provincial Conservatives in his federal riding of Madawaska-Restigouche, in another rural Liberal seat likely to fall victim to the gun registry three-line whip.
- In Québec, future leadership hopeful Justin Trudeau is in a hard-fought contest to hold off the Bloc Québécois M.P. he defeated in 2008, Vivian Barbot, in the riding of Papineau (one of the eight ridings that has come within 5% in each of the last three elections), as is south shore M.P. Alexandra Mendès in Brossard-La Prairie. And in Hull-Aylmer, Liberal whip Marcel Proulx is facing a stiff challenge from former PSAC president and Gatineau ombudsman Nycole Turmel for the NDP, whom Proulx accused of having played footsie with the separatists (a jab timed to coincide with Jack Layton's visit to campaign with her last weekend), apparently forgetting that he had also subsequently tried to recruit her as a Liberal candidate himself. The now-open Liberal seat of Laval-les-Îles meanwhile features a young (and very pregnant!) new Liberal candidate of Haitian background, Karine Joizil, but who was appointed on the heels of much backroom biting, to run against returning Bloc candidate Mohadeli Jetha, who hails from Burundi, along with the former president of the Order of Engineers of Quebec, Zaki Ghavitian for the Conservatives, and trade unionist François Pilon for the NDP. Its prospects are still unclear, but are expected to hinge on the national question in Quebec.
- In Ontario, the Conservative assault on Mark Holland in Ajax-Pickering suffered a setback this week, when star candidate Chris Alexander's inelegant handling of questions about poverty in Canada exposed his inexperience as a politician. But with Conservative Leader Stephen Harper making repeated visits to Mississauga and Brampton, Liberal MPs Ruby Dhalla, Andrew Kania are in very stiff fights; with their neighbouring caucus members unable to coast to their formerly easy victories anymore either. In the north of Toronto class of 1988 M.P.'s Joe Volpe's campaign skills will be severely put to the test by returning Conservative candidate Joe Oliver; while to the south, NDP party president and former MP Peggy Nash appears to have landed a punch on Gerard Kennedy in Parkdale-High Park with the accusation that he had missed a third of the votes in the Commons. Some Liberals privately worried in January that more seats would be on the chopping block, but so far the jury is out. It is also an open question what the state of the race will look like in the open seats of Scarborough-Rouge River and Mississauga East-Cooksville, but I don't have anything really to report in those either, while Kingston and the Islands so far looks to be an open race as well. The Conservatives also seem very interested in Guelph riding, given the Conservative leaders tour visit, though Liberal Frank Valeriote is said to have been working hard locally, and the riding has dashed the Conservatives' hopes before.
- Fortunately for the Liberals, the Conservative Party's own candidate troubles in several western ridings mean that the heat is off Anita Neville in Winnipeg South Centre for now (though the Conservatives have nominated a former Liberal Joyce Bateman to replace their former candidate Ray Hall). But in the north end, the party's new by-election M.P. Kevin Lamoureux, who was elected with the admitted support of nearly half the party's national infrastructure last November (the other half going to Vaughan), will now have to face the NDP's entire Manitoba machine on his own, and with his party's recent dalliance with "white rights" advocates looking to have exactly the opposite effect on turnout amongst aboriginal voters as the snowstorm had last winter.
- On the west coast, Ujjal Dosanjh and Joyce Murray are facing very well funded and stiff challenges from Wei Young and Deborah Meredith in Vancouver, while in Newton-North Delta Sukh Dhaliwal has another three-way fight on his hands, with strong Indo-Canadian women challengers from both the NDP and Conservatives this time (former BC Teachers' Federation president Jimmy Sims for the NDP, and Mani Fallon for the Conservatives who will benefit from the party's ability to divert attention and resources away from Fleetwood-Port Kells), and with both their leaders making visits to the riding, but as yet no visit from Michael Ignatieff. Keith Martin's open seat is now viewed by veteran local observers as returning to its Conservative-NDP roots, the Liberals not having won the seat on their own without Keith Martin on the ballot since 1968.
- And north of 60, Larry Bagnell will face his toughest reelection in years, on the wrong side of the gun registry issue in Yukon, as well.
Realistic pickup opportunities are more sparse for them, one veteran Ontario observer only being able to name two seats on budget night, though I'm sure they would add a few more to the list by now.
- They'll be trying to hold what they have in the Atlantic.
- In eastern Québec, their two best prospects are Nancy Charest in Haute Gaspésie-La Mitis-Matane-Matapédia and Denis Paradis in Brome-Missisquoi, the former running in a seat where the outgoing Bloc MP's performance remains a lingering campaign issue, and the latter in a seat with a weak Conservative candidate less likely to benefit from that party's apparent overtaking of the Liberals as the federalist option in that part of the province.
- In Montréal, hope remains for Noushig Eloyan in Ahuntsic against the Bloc's Maria Mourani and Marc Bruneau against the Bloc's Thierry St-Cyr (a race that also features strong entries from the NDP and Conservatives), but was dashed for former Justice Minister Martin Cauchon in this morning's CROP poll of Outremont, showing NDP lieutenant Tom Mulcair with a 20-point lead (though also sealing a reprieve for Francis Scarpaleggia from the accident-prone candidacy of Conservative Larry Smith).
- In western Québec, they still hold out hope for Steve MacKinnon in Gatineau, based on a pre-writ Segma poll showing the Liberals in second place behind the Bloc. But that poll used party names rather than candidate names and predated the subsequent CROP poll showing the Liberals in fourth place province-wide. Locally, the race is believed to be between incumbent Bloc M.P. Richard Nadeau and Françoise Boivin for the NDP. Lawrence Cannon does not seem to be in serious danger so far from his Liberal opponent in Pontiac this time either, though notably the Conservatives had a bit of trouble recruiting candidates to run in both Gatineau and Hull-Aylmer.
- In eastern Ontario, the Liberals' best hopes, however distant, lie with candidates in more francophone ridings, such as Julie Bourgeois in Glengarry-Prescott-Russell, Bernadette Clement in Stormont-Dundas-South Glengarry, and David Bertschi in Ottawa-Orleans, though recently-nominated former Toronto Board of Trade COO Grant Humes seems set to make Bev Oda work very hard for her return to Ottawa in Durham riding in the 905 East.
- In Toronto, Omar Alghabra in Conservative-held Mississauga-Erindale is a sentimental favourite for Liberals wanting to see his return to the Commons, while NDPer Olivia Chow's seat of Trinity-Spadina is the unsentimental demographic target and the NDP seat they'd next-most like to nab with Outremont being out of play. UPDATE: north of Toronto, they believe they have a much stronger candidate in Mario Ferri, in order to retake Vaughan from Conservative Julian Fantino.
- Moving around the horseshoe, the party is counting on being able to win a two-way fight against Conservatives in Oakville with candidate Max Khan, and counting on Maria Bountrogianni's previous record against NDP M.P. Chris Charlton in Hamilton Mountain, where the two have crossed swords provincially in the past. They also have a strong challenger to Conservative M.P. Ed Holder in former party national president Doug Ferguson in London West.
- Moving a bit northwest of Toronto, Liberals would desperately like to win back their Kitchener seats, particularly Kitchener Centre, where former caucus whip Karen Redmond is running for reelection, and they're holding a candle for a win on the split in Simcoe-Grey where Helena Guergis is running for reelection as an Independent Conservative (though the Simcoe politics blog reports Guergis as winning the sign war to date). They also have a surprisingly strong local candidate Kimberley Love in Bruce-Grey-Owen Sound, a riding that's been perennial hope of the Green Party which seems to have picked a smart young candidate with little local draw this time and is thus unlikely to maintain its second place finish from 2008. But here again, popular Conservative incumbent Larry Miller is considered the easy favourite.
- Another Liberal hoped-for pickup in Sudbury seems to be fading away as multiple observers report it's the Conservative candidate Fred Slade now running the strongest challenge against first-time NDP incumbent Glenn Thibeault.
- Terry Duguid in Winnipeg South is the best hope for a Liberal pickup in Manitoba against Conservative M.P. Rod Bruinooge, though the party can't give up on its former francophone base in Saint-Boniface, currently held by Conservative Shelly Glover, where the Liberal M.P. she defeated Ray Simard is running to regain his seat.
- After that, they got nothing until you get to the waterfront in Vancouver, where they'd like to win back Richmond from Alice Wong with candidate and former Canadian Alliance-turned-Liberal M.P. Joe Peschisolido, and take back West Vancouver-Sunshine Coast-Sea-to-Sky Country from John Weston with Dan Veniez, but probably have the better chance winning back North Vancouver from Andrew Saxton with newcomer Taleeb Noormohamed. John Ivison reports from the west coast that their try for Vancouver-Kingsway, currently held by the NDP's Don Davies, looks unlikely to succeed at this point for candidate Wendy Yuan.
- Two bright spots for the Liberals might be north of 60, where they've recruited two former territorial leaders to run, Joe Handley quite some time ago in Western Arctic, and Paul Okalik just this past week in Nunavut. However, remote ridings are incredibly difficult to out-organize an incumbent in, giving Handley the better chance than Okalik given his earlier start and the cabinet status of Conservative M.P. Leona Aglukkaq. The Conservatives in Western Arctic may also have outsmarted themselves by appointing recent Liberal and territorial health minister Sandy Lee to be their candidate the other week, virtually guaranteeing her no local campaign backup from what's said to be a very grumpy riding association that was last heard to be appealing the appointment to headquarters. Still Handley will be running on his party's position favouring the long gun registry, and against a New Democrat who did not switch his vote, two-term MP Dennis Bevington.
So, best case, 15-18 possible pickups, as against 18 incumbents facing troubles.
That being the case, where is this so-called "squeeze" on the NDP? There would appear to be three aspects to it:
- Liberals will name several NDP seats they believe they can take, some more credibly than others in my view, but often named are: Hamilton Mountain, Trinity-Spadina, London-Fanshawe, Vancouver-Kingsway, St. John's East, Halifax, Ottawa Centre, and the list pretty well trails off after there. No-one is seriously claiming anymore that the Liberals are any threat in northern Ontario ridings, and particularly not in northwestern Ontario where the NDP incumbents voted against the gun registry. If they were, the Liberal leader's tour would have been up there by now. And with the Liberals having fallen to third place in Windsor and the other 2 of the 3 Hamilton seats, regaining those seats seems more of an uphill battle. Regardless, any seats the Liberals win from the NDP or vice versa, are all about enhancing their relative bargaining positions after the election, and not about unseating the Conservative government, contrary to what is being implied by the Liberals' claim they are the only alternative government possible.
- They could also try to execute a "squeeze" by attracting 2008 NDP voters over to the Liberals in seats now held by the Liberals under threat, or which the Liberals would like to win back from the Conservatives in Ontario and the Atlantic provinces, or perhaps by appealing to folks in those provinces who voted Green in protest in 2008 and might be tempted to move on over to the NDP, to move on back to the Liberals instead. But in the last election, the Liberals and NDP both lost votes at the same time in 88 of Ontario's 106 ridings, and the NDP only gained at the Liberals' expense in 15 of them. 2008 Green party supporters would appear to be a better prospect, given that they gained at the Liberals' expense in 102 of the 106 ridings, or even previous Non-Voters who increased in numbers where the Liberal vote dropped in 103 of 106 seats.
- Finally, they seem to be trying to carry off a different kind of squeeze by sending Bob Rae out on secondary tour in support of the Liberal campaigns in ridings where the NDP could make gains at the expense of the Conservatives. Rae has been spotted in Saskatoon-Rosetown-Biggar, Vancouver Island North, and Esquimalt-Juan de Fuca in the past week. So, perhaps part of the attempted squeeze is to prevent the NDP from increasing its relative seat strength with western gains, even if it means reelecting Conservatives.
Now, organizationally, the Liberals are doing a good job filling halls for leader's tour events. But while the party's tour events are drawing critical acclaim from the national media, no-one seems to be noticing their concentration in traditional areas of Liberal strength. Today, for example, they're in Scarborough, supposedly a bastion of Liberal support. Is it that they're concerned about losing the open seat of Scarborough-Rouge River to some other party, or that they know they can at least fill a hall in Scarborough?
With the nominations data entry all but finished now (and thank goodness for that!), we'll continue our unvarnished look at the various parties' prospects in subsequent posts.

Is there any data on party fund raising since the election has been called.
That would be an indication of ground strength.
Good question, BC VoR. The Liberals were spinning their end of quarter fundraising after the writ was issued, saying they were raking in a million a day. Of course the first quarter ended on March 31, but isn’t to be reported until the end of April, just days before the vote.
And that’s just the central party fundraising. We won’t get data on the ridings or candidates for quite awhile yet, though the EDA returns will start trickling in at the end of May.
Wont see that till long after.
The amusing novel The Best Laid Plans by Terry Fallis sprang to mind when I started reading this. Perhaps a not fictional Daniel Addison is needed in a few ridings. :)
@catherine – I haven’t seen anything about Jack advocating “strategic” voting. (Not saying it hasn’t happened, but I have been following the campaign and I haven’t seen it.)
I HAVE seen Jack make the point that the REAL strategic anti-Tory vote in places like Saskatchewan, Edmonton, BC is to vote New Democrat.
While Mulcair is modestly naming only five target ridings outside Outremont, The NDP’s leading candidate in the Quebec City riding, Raymond Cote, wants to expand the list: “he believes the 2011 vote will be marked by the election of the first New Democrat elected in the Quebec region. He gives himself the best chance of achieving this among the NDP candidates in the capital.”
http://www.cyberpresse.ca/le-soleil/dossiers/elections-federales/201104/07/01-4387733-beauport-limoilou-lespoir-liberal-et-la-confiance-neo-democrate.php
Another example of a 2008 star (“the only New Democrat in the region to get more than 6,000 votes”) moving to a stronger riding. Maybe it will work?
Jad @1254PM…..your stories about liberal attendance at rallies is totally incorrect. Iggy outdrew Harper 3 to 1 in Hamilton last week. That was confirmed by many journalists. Iggy has had great attendance except for some Quebec ridings where the level of interest is still higher than the last election.
Wilf Day…Mulcair will be the only dipper elected in Queebc and that is not a shoo in by any means.
Anyone know when the book by Normand Lester on the sponsorship scandal is due out? It’s supposed to be coming before E-Day.
Though in the next breath, the memoirs of Julie Couillard were hotly anticipated during the last election, and they completely fizzled out.
Terrance I appreciate a good partisan cheerleader but I don’t know if its credible for you to say Ignatieff is doing better than Dion did in Quebec last election.
It was the only province where Liberal support actually INCREASED in the ‘08 election.
By +3% where as across Canada the drop was -4%.
From what i’ve heard from reporters like Jean Lappierre is that the Liberal support has collapsed outside the province of Montreal and gone CPC.
They are the federalist party in much of the province.
Ignatieff’s tour was very, very poorly attended.
And the tour went off the rails with the shocking revelation that a homophobic racist was a duly nominated Liberal candidate for an extended period of time.
Sorry Terrance but every indication is that things are going worse in Quebec for the Liberals than on the last time out.
Not every last indication, Shadow. Nanos has had the Liberals tracking up in Quebec over the past few days. The thing is that we only have one daily tracking pollster in this campaign, unfortunately, so there’s no reality check on his numbers. Once we get another CROP, we’ll have something to compare against.
Yeah according to Nanos the support is highly efficient because its all concentrated on the island of Montreal.
Hence my caveat in my above comment.
We should distinguish between the continued, gradual decline of the Liberals in the rest of Quebec with their steady Montreal strength.
Ignatieff was basically laughed out of town when he went to Drummondville and told the crowd that if they wanted to stop the Bloc they needed to vote Liberal.
That hasn’t been true since 2004.
Malcolm, I’m just referring to the various news reports from the first week, which ran with headlines along the lines “Layton makes plea for strategic voting”. This could be compatible with your statement about the strategic vote to defeat Harper. It is also compatible with one of the NDP ads which makes the same pitch, saying the NDP was first or second in 102 (or something like that, may have the number wrong) ridings.
Layton’s message to voters seems to be: we can hold Harper to a minority by voting strategically. It is certainly a realistic message but I was struck with the large contrast with his message in the last election and coming out with it so soon in the campaign. It is actually the most likely outcome, but it is still early in the campaign and I don’t completely rule out either a Harper majority or a Liberal minority.
Layton said to vote strategically for the only opposition party that would make a difference and keep to their left wing promises in opposition – the NDP.
” Iggy outdrew Harper 3 to 1 in Hamilton last week. That was confirmed by many journalists. ”
Sorry, Terence, your partisan stripes are showing. That would have meant Ignatieff’s crowd was around 3,000.
But to be fair, give me a couple of links to your “many journalists” that say this was so, and I’ll agree with you.
Apologies, Alice, I know you don’t like partisan bickering, but I also know you don’t approve of unsupported “facts”.
Remember that a Hamilton rally would be drawing from ridings as far away as Niagara Falls, Haldimand-Norfolk, and all the away around to Burlington on the other side. The TV station there, CHCH-Hamilton, serves communities in Kitchener-Cambridge-Guelph as well. It is a way to reach southwestern Ontario and bypass the Toronto-based media, which might not have led the news with a rally by either leader.
In any event, I would argue that the measure of a party’s strength is not its ability to draw crowds in its traditional areas of strength, but in areas in which it would like to grow. The NDP could fill a rally in Windsor as easily as the Liberals can fill one in Scarborough or the Conservatives could in Calgary.
Jad: I agree with Pundit that crowd number is a silly measure, but since you seem to think Harper had 1000 at his Hamilton rally, let me point out that it was confined to a ballroom listed as max cap of 450 and from all the film and shots of the event (many available at the Hamilton Spectator) it is clear that there is still noticeable room for people to move around in. This link reports 300: http://www.thespec.com/news/elections/article/513946–few-surprises-at-harper-rally.
The ballroom Ignatieff used has a capacity of 800, but one can see from the films and shots that people were standing next to each other, shoulder to shoulder, and another 100 or so are shown outside of the room, listening through the open doors (a great pic of this somewhere on the web). This link reports 900: http://www.thespec.com/news/elections/article/513941–ignatieff-promises-not-to-weaken-gun-registry
I saw other media reports which used the numbers 350 and 1000, and the first person accounts from people who attended *both* events went as high as 400 and 1200. Clearly there is some room for dispute, but three times is in rough agreement with all the data.
Apologies for the t/j on a not very important topic, but I had followed the videos/pics/coverage on this.
Shadow and Jad must be craiglisters on retainer. They repeat CON talking points like chosen morsels from a john howard speech, or more recently, ripped from 2002 Sheila Fraser reports…
I think they have something substantive to contribute, and frequently.
Which is more than I can say for you so far. Looking forward to that changing.
Burlivespipe, we try not to make personal comments here. There are multiple places available on the Internet to engage in hand-to-hand combat, so it’s nice to keep one as free as possible of it, and as focused on facts and data as we can be.
But let me put this challenge to you, because you’ve expressed some concern about some of the things that have been said. Which aspects of anything that’s said do you disagree with, and what facts or data can you bring to the table to help us expand our point of view. Everyone has a point of view, but everyone can equally benefit from having it expanded by the points of view of others.
A different point of view, honestly expressed, is a gift that helps us understand others, and perhaps understand our own perspective a bit better as well.
Why not take the opportunity to help us expand our perspectives, by pointing out the things that seem wrong to you, and explain why you believe they are.
It will be genuinely appreciated, believe me.
Why the double standard? Jad’s dig about someone just giving the *correct* information being partisan is inflammatory – which is what prompted me to respond, even though a simple google shows who is correct. Burlivespipe’s comment also wasn’t useful and this is good to point out, but he was responding to something that had already been started.
Anyway, I do get a sense of who is and is not welcome here, so I will bow out. Cheers.
Sorry, catherine. I can’t keep up with all the comments and all the twitter and all the nominations equally. I was making a general comment to everyone.
You are all welcome here, and if by my general distractedness I have offended someone I’m truly sorry for that. What happens is that when a post goes onto National Newswatch and a lot of new commenters arrive, I try to step in from time to time to keep things focused on data.
There is a flood of incoming in my world the past few weeks: emails, tweets, comments, data, news stories, people sending in their websites and facebook pages. I’m trying my very best catherine, but don’t have the time I’d like to ensure every reader feels they’ve been heard in an even-handed way.
Since you feel you haven’t been, please accept my sincere apology. I’ll try and do better.